Shortly before Christmas I had a poem published. It quotes the song ‘Just the way you are.’ So does my last blog-post. You might call this ironic. (Yes, it rained on my wedding day.)
Olivia, Beatified
Dear, think not that they will
forget you:
-If craftsmanly art should be mine
I will build up a temple, and set you
Therein as its shrine.
-If craftsmanly art should be mine
I will build up a temple, and set you
Therein as its shrine.
-
Thomas Hardy
If I wanted you to be a
saint
I’d call you Saint
Cecilia who sings celestial charms
that soothe the raging heart.
I could pray to Saint
Audrey
(as they do in Ely)
whose tawdry trinkets were at first the cause
of curse, but then became a balm.
If I banished you to the
kitchen,
with subservience of
Martha, a saint of domesticity, you could
claim your rightful title of a martyr.
You could castigate
yourself; a cross
between Rapunzel and
Saint Barbara. You’d piss me off, for sure – far more
than I already irked your father.
No, I don’t want you as
a saint.
Do I not apotheosize
you? God knows, I worship you; set you
up upon a Thomas Hardy shrine.
I don’t want you for
eternity;
I want you here and now.
Not perfect, godly, or divine;
not with a halo, nor angelic glow.
I crave the present: the
saints
are dead; numbered with
the stars. Like Billy Joel or Jerome Kern,
I love you – just the
way you are.
Sometimes,
when you place someone on a pedestal, you can fool yourself that they are
better than they are. Literally too good to be true, they fool themselves and
the truth is neither in them nor the person who worships them. That poem was
from my sequence of poems called The
Olive Box, which charts a fictional love affair with a violinist called
Olivia.
The
persona in the poems thought that his Olivia could do no wrong, mistaking her
‘saintly’ acts for non-reciprocal altruism. He never imagined that she was
anything other than his own (flawed) projection of perfection. As I said last
month, those who apply the ‘Just the Way
You Are’ fantasy-ideal to their lovers, partners, or wives are probably deluded
fools.
In
2014 I fell for someone who turned out to be someone completely other than who
she presented to me, and who tricked me into a relationship more fake than a
prostitute’s orgasm. Naturally, I was pretty pissed off. When I discovered she
had got married while we were still supposedly seeing each other, I was
horrified. And when I found out she was pregnant I realised that, in my
naïveté, I may have given far more than just my heart to her.
This
time last year the man who she married, having discovered her pre-marital
infidelity, in complicity with her egregious deception attempted to silence me.
By setting up various fake social-media profiles, in his pathetic envy he wanted
to avenge me for the fact that his fiancé was fucking around. Using false,
defamatory and misleading information, he posted emails, tweets and messages in
an attempt to sway all my friends, followers and associates.
He
failed, of course. And pissed off a lot of people.
Perhaps
he was in denial of the whole affair – the mark of a man deceived. He was
warned that his activities were illegal, yet he persisted, leaving himself
vulnerable. He began his campaign against me on Christmas Day 2014, spuriously
claiming some misplaced altruism that might protect the children of the world.
I suspect he was keen to protect his own child, due in March 2015, from the knowledge
that its ‘dad’ might not be his ‘father.’
By
keeping her affair from their friends and family, they will be deceiving them
all over the dubitable paternity of the child. For some reason, he is in
complicity with this deceit. Above all, he was in a relationship with someone
other than the person who she alleged to be. He is deceiving himself far more
than she ever deceived him or me. This, then, is the Truth.
The
primary act of infidelity is the kiss. And this was how it was with us. We had
been on a bicycle ride to Musselburgh where we ate a shop-bought picnic by the
beach, then attended a spoken-word evening. I read one of my Cautionary Tales,
written especially for her. After the evening was over and the other people had
left the room, as we were about to leave she turned and kissed me on the lips.
Then she apologised. With caution, I invited a second kiss.
This
was the point that her carefully-planned deception kicked in. She explained how
she’d never done anything like it before. Allegedly fiercely independent and
supposedly innocent (to use that word in a compound sense) she nonetheless
seemed pretty confident that her bold act was the pre-cursor to sex. She announced
this idea to herself in pretend surprise.
Unfortunately,
her intention at that stage was scuppered by a strange incident as we took to
our bikes for the journey back. Having extracted, with alarming insistence,
more information out of me than I was prepared to give about my personal
history, she pushed away on her bicycle. I called after her, “Your rear light
isn’t on!” Glancing behind to check, she swerved and hit the kerb. Her bicycle
flew out of control and she landed chin-first on the pavement.
There
was a lot of blood. She lost her memory, momentarily. (I later learned from an
article about her that she previously suffered from amnesia.) And in some pain,
I remember quite clearly, she whimpered, “I love you.” Nowhere was open, so
using my meagre ration of pocket tissues to soak up the blood, we made the long
journey back to my flat with her chin dripping profusely all over her bicycle,
down her long, red coat, and onto my doorstep.
Unperturbed
by my dearth of first aid supplies, she seemed more intent on pressing her body
against mine, thrusting herself into me in movements I can only describe as
mock copulatory. Were it not for her wounds, we might have had sex there and
then. But I, for one, don’t fuck on a first date and she, more important, was
keen to get home and get cleaned up. I called a taxi. One good thing: she’d
have to return for her blood-soaked bike at some point…
Later
she texted me to say that she’d driven herself to the hospital (despite being
incapable of handling a bicycle.) She was told she needed stitches, yet she
refused. I suspect that it was her fiancé (about whom I knew nothing) who drove
her there; I doubt either was keen for her to have a stitched-up face on their
wedding day. Is that ironic? How she explained to him what had happened, I’ll
never know. The expression ‘stitched up’ seems doubly fitting.
This
was in May – or as the German Romantic poets would say, Im wundershönen monat Mai. Although it would be some months before
I learned about her wedding, this was the start of a ‘Dichterliebe’ episode that, if nothing else, produced a tranche of
words flowing from my pen as fast as the blood that dripped from her chin that portentous
night in May.
One
day, I may send the lot to her – or to him. Perhaps there are others who would
like to know the Truth. One day, I might send the lot to them. For now, I will post
them here.
And this is how it
happens in Allegory
Today we have
discovered the truth:
“Beware the flatterer… who spreadsa net for his neighbour’s feet.”
You will go on a long, long journey.
It may be by earth or air or sea
or possibly – to modernise the myth –
by train or tram or car or bicycle.
You will face challenges and obstacles;
inclement weather; or the roadways, rough
with dips and steps, will trip and throw you off.
You’ll lose your mind, but not the man you’re with.
You’ll meet along your journey characters
personified by adjectives; monsters,
demons, beasts, or words too strong to mention.
Your injuries you’ll shrug off with derision…
but not the memory of that contusion
that will bleed profusely for eleven days,
portentous. But you’ll press on anyway,
determined to complete your subtle mission.
There will be complications that will try
your metal, psychological and physical.
And sometimes, lured by flattery,
or tempted by a voice that utterly
beguiles, you may return the compliment.
And as you spread your net (for it was meant
to be a double-trap) you’ll lose control
and fall headlong into your own hyperbole.
For on this trip, which from its conception
will be analogous with its deception,
you’ll find yourself, at last, relieved
to hold on to the one you most deceived.
It’s not the journey but the destination;
not the means that justifies your celebration,
but the end. You won’t have travelled far.
And yet your flesh will bear another’s scar.
For those unfamiliar with Schumann’s song cycle, Dichterliebe, here is a video. My poem summarises the whole piece, but adds a twist in the tale.
Es ist eine alte geschichte,
Doch bleibt sie immer neuUnd wem sie just passieret,
Dem bricht das Herz entzwei.
A young man loves a maiden but –
to cut an old, old story short – she loves somebody else. This doesn’t stop
him sing of flowers in bloom, of birdsong, spring;
his sighs become a choir of nightingales;
compares her to a dove, a rose, the sun,
and – most peculiarly – the Virgin Mary
(although to ‘plunge his soul into her lily’
is a euphemism only poetry
or Romantic Song would dare to sing.)
Naturally, the story ends in tears.
He passes by a wedding-feast and hears
the sound of pipes and drums, a string quartet,
and, wracked with grief that stars illuminate,
and morning summer sun will not forget,
the sad, pale man refuses yet to hate
the one who disabused him of her love;
he grudgingly concedes to her distress.
He calls upon her in his dreams and weeps,
throwing himself at her unforgiving feet;
is beckoned by the hand of fairy-tales
that ancient melodies delight to tease
as if the very flowers pity or please
the man. The white hand in the mist dissolves
as morning sun awakens his resolve
to sink the hurtful songs into the ocean –
with them, his heavy heart, so deeply broken.
What happens to the girl, we’ll never know.
It is a tale repeated ever-new:
presumably, therefore, in time as she
regrets, she’ll ditch the ‘other man.’ And he
will also feel his heart breaking in two.
Do not fear - there will be more in February, when Saint Valentine pins his flaccid tail to the donkey of idiotic, god-forsaken love.
No comments:
Post a Comment