There was one person whose work made a big impact on me
during this Fringe. A brilliant actor, Helen Duff, successfully flyered me a
few years ago, and coincidentally was performing in the same venue as me this
year. Her show was a solo piece about anorexia, combining drama, clown, and
improvisation.
I was apprehensive about going. I have had more than one
relationship with someone with an eating disorder history, and have been
personally affected by the effects of this serious mental health condition. The
way Helen tackled the subject with humour and drama was incredibly moving. Had I
reviewed the show, I would have given it five stars without hesitation. So here
is my take.
Vanity Bites Back ✭✭✭✭✭
As a self-confessed
exploration of anorexia, this show is not an easy sell. Yet from the start we
are lured into empathy with the solo performer. Offering Digestive biscuits to
every member of the audience, Duff immediately develops a jovial rapport, and then
takes us into the contrivance of the show. We are watching a Television Pilot
of a Cookery Show hosted by a slightly crazy 1950’s cookery presenter-cum-Home
Economics teacher.
The recipe of the day is
cheesecake. Realising that she has given the chief ingredient to the audience,
Duff proceeds to collect the biscuits back. However, most have been eaten. One person
complains that they saved it for later, to which Duff retorts, “Well now is
later – that’s how time works.” In ‘real time’ we are given an absurd cookery
demonstration, involving an attempt to melt butter by placing the pack between
two close-sat audience-members.
But through ‘flash-back’
we get serious food for thought.
The hilarity, clowning,
and quick humour disguise a carefully devised script. While our TV host mixes
ingredients or spreads butter up her arms (the relationship with food, demonstrably
complex and distressing) we get insights into the back-story of her eating
disorder, and a horrific, life-changing incident. At these points the audience
falls into rapt silence.
Duff is completely in
control of her craft at every stage of her performance. But then, ‘control’ is
often an underlying factor in this disorder. Some of the ‘clowning’ with food might
be viewed as distasteful, yet we are quickly snapped out of our reaction as
Duff apologises, “We’re not in the business of making people uncomfortable!”
Regarding her cheesecake demonstration, the completed creation
is clearly inedible, although our host points out “We’ve had fun.” But have we?
Having been subtly led through a narrative of trauma disguised as a funny,
anarchic Fringe-show in a dank cave on Niddrie Street, some may feel that Duff
is either taking the biscuit, or the piss.
But when she comes out of character and speaks as Helen, the
real person who has made this show – not the cookery pilot but this Fringe-show
– the work turns into a powerful, emotional and thoroughly honest piece of
theatre. Art, as we know, is a lie that helps us to understand the truth. “This
is what I have,” says Helen Duff: “Me. Hello?”
There may have been more
than one person in the audience fighting back tears then. Helen’s performance
was produced in association with B-eat, the UK's leading support network
dedicated to beating eating disorders. Through her honesty, integrity, and
artistic prowess, Helen Duff is a powerful ambassador whose work deserves a
bigger audience. Art may lie, but truth will tell.
Here, then, is the next in my series of stories for this
year.
from
Charlotte & The Charlatan
– and other
cautionary tales
Charlotte & The Potato
Lottie liked potatoes. She liked them quite
a lot. She cooked them by the plateful; she cooked them by the pot. She loved
the musical ones – Chopin, Mozart, Vivaldi; savoured Harmony and Melody well;
Nicola, Nadine and Annabelle. Oval, long, or round, she’d buy them by the
pound. Fluffy, smooth, firm to the bite, she’d purchase every type: King
Edward, Maris Piper, or the nutty ones called Anya that you get in M-&-S or
Tesco. But her favourite was the Charlotte Potato.
Lottie
cooked potatoes in every conceivable style. Boiled, baked, roasted; steamed,
mashed, chipped, even toasted. Once in a while she’d try something fancy: Dauphinoise,
Parmentier; or she’d boil them ’til al
dente for Salade Niçoise;
chop them with chives and add mayonnaise. Bangers and Mash was a staple for
Charlotte, and swordfish went best with sweet potato lightly crushed; while for
Kippers, Roosters were always a must, tossed with sea-salt, or in their
jackets, perhaps.
Sauté,
wedges, crisps, or gratin; Bombay, Cajun; Spanish Omelette, or Corned Beef Hash:
Charlotte prepared a potato in any way a human humanly can. Except for one
thing. Although Charlotte loved potatoes, she couldn’t stomach them. She could
only bear to eat them adorned with little more than butter and pepper. Those
who knew who her better knew that, for all her dabbling with the culinarily
experimental, she couldn’t eat a potato in any other form than elemental.
This,
she claimed, was for a simple but spurious reason. It was due to the taste.
But
‘taste’ as we know comes from ‘gusto’ – or in French, dégoûté. If potatoes fill you with disgust, you must vomit them out
straightaway. And this is what Charlotte did. She kept this hidden, but when
she met the Charlatan her secret was discovered. By then, recovered from her
purging, Lottie was healthy again, so the Charlatan introduced cuisine that
Charlotte had never seen.
With
dishes Italians call farinaceous, he thought gnocchi would be a sensible start
(he wanted to win her stomach before her heart) then every variety of
pasta-and-sauce, which he put, of course, before pastry. Salads more tasty than
she’d ever tried, and vegetables, roots, tubers, fruits and legumes; from
mundane to exotic, prickly to passionate, even erotic.
Meat
he presented in joints, cuts, casseroles, stews; and of fruits-of-the-sea there
was much to choose: Charlotte adopted a Sea-food diet. As soon as she saw it,
she wanted to try it, attacking mussels with nymphomaniacal fervour, she
ignored oysters’ aphrodisiacal claim.
All
the same, the Wizard considered her hooked. There was, however, something he’d
overlooked. Charlotte was intelligent, wise, but her mind was academic; her
body was ruled by a controlling condition. Lottie was bulimic. Her stomach was
full but her heart was an open sore. When the Charlatan told her he loved her,
Charlotte wanted no more.
Of
the Charlatan’s love, Charlotte was in no doubt. But she hated herself, and
bloated by his affection, she stuck her fingers down her throat. And puked him
out.
(ADDED, September 24TH)
from
Charlotte & The Charlatan
– and other
cautionary tales
(ADDED, September 24TH)
from
Charlotte & The Charlatan
– and other
cautionary tales
Polly the Pilferer
Polly was witty, intelligent, wise, so why
she loved to plagiarise was anybody’s guess. She had money and means and plenty
of friends; a fiancé and a wedding dress; she had beauty and talent and
suffered little emotional pain; she had a fertile body and an equally fertile
brain. Was she greedy or needy or envious? Her life was hardly bereft of
material acquisitions, so why the serial compulsion for theft of other people’s
possessions?
Her
husband-to-be was well-endowed (at least, financially) and could give Polly
(almost) anything: she only had to ask. Perhaps she was hiding behind an
invisible mask; Polly craved a different sort of satisfaction that required deceit.
She devised an elaborate plan, and steadily put it into action.
She
set up a fraudulent Facebook page with photos purloined from the internet.
Whatever she wanted Polly would get: her Youtube channel had videos filched
from other users’ shows – she’d paste over the captions and pass them off as
her own. Her twitter was mainly re-tweets – she never gave her opinions away –
and her Tumblr and Pinterest profiles attracted attention, although they were
frauds through and through.
Her
cuckoo-nest blog gained a hundred daily views: nobody thought it absurd or knew
that Polly had written not a single word. Her Curriculum Vitae was peppered with qualifications – most of them
fake or invented – and her entire work-history was only a mystery to Polly, for
no prospective employer suspected her life was not her own, but rented. She
went through every job like a vulture, picking off posts as if they were
carrion; usurping positions, jumping the queue. If anyone dared to challenge
her she would carry on with a different department.
Polly
had not the slightest care for what ‘affairs-of-the-heart’ meant. She’d found
herself a suitably older man to marry. He had a couple of grown-up offspring –
for Polly this wasn’t a worry. There was, however, one thing of which he was
incapable. Due to a small operation called a vasectomy. No matter, he had
money, and as he slid the engagement ring on her finger, Polly created another
scheme.
She
joined a dating website where she posed as a rich business-women. Her few
photos were real, her profile, alluring, her appeal soon created a stir. Polly
was pretty particular about her Perfect Partner, and found the ideal sort:
sensitive, intelligent, a good sense of humour and friendly smile. And most
important: virile. By night, she said she loved him but, by daylight, she
robbed him. ‘Whether a lover, husband, best friend, acquaintance
or even, enemy,’ she told
him: ‘I want you in my life in any capacity.’
She
lured him like a honey-pot; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter. She didn’t
really want him; what she wanted was a daughter. And much as Polly loved her
fiancé (especially his money) he
couldn’t provide her with her greatest need. All the same, reader, she married
him. Then she dumped her part-time lover, having plagiarised his seed.